That's right!
They are all over each other sometimes. They are far apart sometimes. But they are always together in the end. They are connected. They need each other, because one on its own can accomplish nothing.
Romeo and Juliet on the other hand... they have sex and die. The end.
HOW PROFOUND IS THAT!?!?!?
Devious Comments
--
J. Clayton
Like a weeboo, but french
They are just stuck like that. Like siamese twins. That's not romantic. That's just sort of annoying. ^^
--
"Friendship is certainly the finest balm for the pangs of disappointed love."
-Jane Austen (Northanger Abbey)
--
"Friendship is certainly the finest balm for the pangs of disappointed love."
-Jane Austen (Northanger Abbey)
Not that R&J are particularly romantic. Shakespeare makes me want to vomit. But that's besides the point.
I'm not saying that feet are romantic. I'm saying that feet are more romantic than Romeo and Juliet. Thus, Romeo and Juliet are less romantic than feet.
I like Shakespeare, but not so much Romeo and Juliet.
Really, I just thought the comparison was funny, and kind of genius. I'm just awesome sometimes. lol
--
"Friendship is certainly the finest balm for the pangs of disappointed love."
-Jane Austen (Northanger Abbey)
--
"Friendship is certainly the finest balm for the pangs of disappointed love."
-Jane Austen (Northanger Abbey)
Previous PageNext Page